Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 September 7

< September 6	September 8 >

September 7[edit]

File:Agaricus benesii.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The linked page (http://www.fugleognatur.dk/wildaboutdenmark/rights.asp) says "Your permission to access and view the website is limited to personal, non-commercial use. Information from this website (such as wildlife reports) may be listed in articles, websites or other sources, but ONLY with full credits to www.wildaboutdenmark.com." I don't know where you got GFDL (or CC-BY-SA-3.0, which you also claim), but that definitely does not seem to be the case. NW (Talk) 01:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment First, I got the GFDL and CC 3.0 from a similar case. Secondly, for some reason, I can't contact the photographer at his website to get OTRS permissions, so I've marked it for deletion myself. :) Cheers, I'^mperator 02:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TrainOSE-logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Lifebaka (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree (fair use) logo no longer in use and not needed. Owner TrainOSE S.A. replaced it with a new logo of different design. Sv1xv (talk) 11:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wc92.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:39, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of a sporting event. I doubt the copyright belongs to the uploader. J Milburn (talk) 14:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wc96.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:39, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of a sporting event. I doubt the copyright belongs to the uploader. J Milburn (talk) 14:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Williamson schoolstation.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:39, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MIPimage2.jpg[edit]

Procedural nomination. CSD rationale: "This file is copied from the website of ISRO (Right to Information act only covers access, but Indian government pictures are not automatically public domain per the Indian Copyright Act of 1957, Chapter V, Section 25)" NW (Talk) 17:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per what I said. This is a picture from the Indian government and only texts of laws, judicial opinions, and other government reports are free from copyright - other government works produced in 2008 enter the public domain in 2069 according to the Act. Hekerui (talk) 19:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010HyosungGT250RFI.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Jclemens (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently a copy of http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/photos/2010models/2010-Hyosung-GT250RFIc.jpg Brianhe (talk) 18:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Total Motorcycle approves this use of our copyright. - Mike Le Pard - Founder, www.totalmotorcycle.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.181.37 (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]