Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 September 23
September 23[edit]
File:Ionel fernic dutch angle.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
source is insufficient to establish expiration of copyright Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Claims to be from Flacăra yearbook 1989, which is probably Romania, which has author+70 y copyright, so almost certainly not expired. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Justin+Bieber++1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
no source, no license, appears to be professional headshot Skier Dude (talk) 05:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Coronel Pringles.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seems promotional and taken from air, unlikely to be taken by user \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree, it seems to just have been taken from the roof of another building. — neuro(talk) 11:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep looks to be taken from another building and is not promoting anything that I can see in the picture. I have renamed this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I took this photo myself from a 7th floor balcony in Av 25 de Mayo y Mitre David(Talk • Contribs) 22:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Xgpblack.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Blatantly unfree, website listed does not list CC. — neuro(talk) 11:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:2304 6.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, small, no source, no valid license. OsamaK 20:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Bradford Sabres (1).gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The author isn't the uploader, no link for this image being free. OsamaK 20:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:CrestUWO.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a logo. No source, no valid license. It's also orphan OsamaK 20:20, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete too small to be useful here. If uploader really created it themselves they could have supplied a better quality image. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Donate.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader isn't the author. Nothing in the website about this image being free. OsamaK 20:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Bertholdvstauffenberg.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"as a German photograph that is more than 50 years old, it is in the public domain under Article 72 of German copyright law."... I am aware of no such law Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.