Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 4
July 4
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
unlikely composite image. MBisanz talk 05:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free image from Microsoft Office clip art. OsamaK 14:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a screenshot. OsamaK 14:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image size and lack of meta data means it was likely taken from a website. Polly (Parrot) 21:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A book cover, uploader is very unlikely to hold the copyright. Small image size is also indicative of being taken from a website. Polly (Parrot) 21:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Small image size and lack of meta data, image was likely taken from a website. Polly (Parrot) 21:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A promotional photo, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 23:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Album cover artwork, uploader is unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 23:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image is claimed as PD but I can see it was uploaded to this forum 2 years prior to upload here. The image appears to be a magazine or other printed source scan, not a self-created image. Peripitus (Talk) 23:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Uploader is the creator of the artwork and the image of Lovelyshopper (talk) 08:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)this file.[reply]
- This image falls into the same category as the File:Rover 400 (1991).jpg one and I still think the same as I have said about that image, I as the uploader hold the copyright on wikipedia for this image which was ammended very slightly using the editing software which comes as part of the photo-editing program in my "Lexmark 1200 series All-In-One-Centre" printer.
- The photogram of the Leyland P96 was also edited using this software, but at the the time of loading I didn't realise that you needed a "METADATA" section in the image upload as none of the images that I looked at before uploading my own had one on them either. Dreamweaverjack (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.