Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 12
| < January 11 | January 13 > |
|---|
January 12
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image is noted as free but is sourced from a Wiki where the image has no source nor copyright information (see http://www.telugupedia.com/wiki/index.php?title=Image:MaheshBabu.jpg) Peripitus (Talk) 05:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The url gives me a hint that this is unfree. Undead Warrior (talk) 05:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are already free images which show the band performing already in the article Dethklok. No need for this unfree one... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image is available from various places on the internet including http://www.telugufilmblog.com/2008_01_03_archive.html - appears to be a professional photo not a GFDL self one Peripitus (Talk) 05:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: delete. --Kanonkas : Talk 09:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Image sourced from a news website that does not have a free license declaration Peripitus (Talk) 05:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Judging by uploader's talk page [1], the PD claim may be off. Not usuable under fair-use, as a free version shouldn't be too hard to come by. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 10:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence it was self-made. User's history and talk page [2] would imply otherwise. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 10:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence it was self-made. User's history and talk page [3] would imply otherwise. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 10:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence it was self-made. User's history and talk page [4] would imply otherwise. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 10:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence it was self-made. User's history and talk page [5] would imply otherwise. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 10:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence it was self-made. User's history and talk page [6] would imply otherwise. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 10:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a confusing case. For some reason the thumbnail on the older version of the image uploaded by Cgros841 (who does have a history of suspect uploads) is not showing up for me. Based on the data I can see (i.e., size and dimensions of the newer image, as well as the presence of metadata and a new name in the description) I am inclined to think that the newer version (uploaded by Splitsecond is non-violating unless checkuser evidence to the contrary were provided. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried deleting and undeleting to see if that would clear up the problem viewing the old version and got these errors:
Error deleting file: Could not rename file "public/archive/6/6b/20051014095942!AirHockeyTable.JPG" to "deleted/k/g/d/kgdvb6zxgr7vx861veo7rp051d5biza.jpg". Error undeleting file: Could not find file "deleted/k/g/d/kgdvb6zxgr7vx861veo7rp051d5biza.jpg".
I am assured on IRC that this is a result of the problem from a few months ago that caused a bunch of images to be screwed up by the cache system, and that the image is not recoverable. Since I'm not able to undelete the broken version, here's the information on it: "04:03, 29 September 2005 . . Cgros841 (Talk | contribs | block) 1,792×1,200 (426,867 bytes) (Photo by Craig M. Groshek, all rights released)" --Random832 (contribs) 01:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence it was self-made. User's history and talk page [7] would imply otherwise. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 20:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd almost argue to keep as too simple for copyright. Stifle (talk) 12:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Fixed OTRS received & templates fixed/ commons image. Skier Dude (talk) 19:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC) No source, claimed PD-self but low-res Stifle (talk) 21:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a higher resolution version of the same image here. I see no reason to assume bad faith, given that the user had no history of image violations (the previous PUI listed was another version of the same image), and the images contain valid metadata. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:40, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I re-made the Max Keiser article. I found the image on Wikipedia as a left-over from the old deleted article. If you delete the image quickly I can get Stacy Herbert (Max Keiser's wife + business partner) to re-upload the image on her own account. There is an alternative image of Max on Commons right now (same filename) which Stacy has already certified as GFDL / CC Share-Alike. --Salimfadhley (talk) 12:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
