Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 18
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 18
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Originally uploaded as {{Non-free historic image}} with no FuR; uploader changed license to {{PD-self}} which is clearly incorrect. Given incorrect change to license, listing here for further clarification. Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Adding File:Dick Booth, GU Grad.jpg, File:Vregh Godoshian GU Grad.jpg, and File:Telecar RW.jpg same uploader, same reason. Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cover dva.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Free magazine cover ? I think that this is a copyrighted image Peripitus (Talk) 12:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Deleted. WP:NFCC#Enforcement places the entire burden of compliance on the editor(s) wishing to retain an item non-free content. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wangkun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- film made in 1965. According to the copyright info on the page then this is NOT public domain until at least 2015, later if the copyright holder lived beyond the first showing. Peripitus (Talk) 12:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It's a screenshot of a 1965 communist Chinese film, iconic and irreplaceable. Badagnani (talk) 16:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Iconic or not - the free licence appears completely incorrect. - Peripitus (Talk) 06:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It's an irreplaceable screenshot. Regardless of copyright, screenshots may still be legally used under the principle of fair use in the U.S. or fair dealing and similar laws in other countries. Badagnani (talk) 18:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wave Energy Can.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- can design will be copyright, photo is a derivative Thedarxide (talk) 20:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Huamanga Cathedral.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Originally tagged PUI Oct 2, 2007 but never listed. Link to images website does not work. Says it was copied from Peru Government website, but tagged as PD. After Midnight 0001 22:29, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fusion Junction.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- If this is the cover of an "in production" artbook, it would clearly fall within the non-free use criteria. —Farix (t | c) 22:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.