Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 15
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 15[edit]
File:200458605-003.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:200458605-003.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Getty Images watermark. Melesse (talk) 04:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged as a copyright violation of http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/200458605-003/Stone MilborneOne (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:CrusaderLogo.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nomination undisputed and reasons plausible so deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CrusaderLogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be user-created art based on the complete school logo - low quality derivative not really accurate to original Skier Dude (talk) 07:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Susanboylefanphotograph.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No author information, no way to verify validity of license considering Photobucket is the source. — Huntster (t @ c) 10:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Karim Keramuddin.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Karim Keramuddin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- User has a well-documented inability to tell the truth about images he/she found on the Internet. I can't find an original source for this one so I'm bringing it here instead of deleting outright, but all signs point to this being a copyright violation. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mohammad Yosuf Kargar.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mohammad Yosuf Kargar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- User has a well-documented inability to tell the truth about images he/she found on the Internet. I can't find an original source for this one so I'm bringing it here instead of deleting outright, but all signs point to this being a copyright violation. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Obaidullah Karimi.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Obaidullah Karimi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- User has a well-documented inability to tell the truth about images he/she found on the Internet. I can't find an original source for this one so I'm bringing it here instead of deleting outright, but all signs point to this being a copyright violation. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.