Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 22
August 22
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
pretty clear it's not a magazine cover; use on article also questionable Skier Dude (talk) 01:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment as the bot notes this page is not primarily intended for disputet non-free images. Looks like a logo to me, so might just re-tag it as such, and then flag it for missing a non-free use rationale. Or just apply WP:CSD#F7: "Non-free images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag (such as a {{Non-free logo}} tag on a photograph of a mascot) may be deleted immediately." --Sherool (talk) 15:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot, doubtful it was released under CC3.0 license Skier Dude (talk) 02:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot, doubtful it was released under CC3.0 license Skier Dude (talk) 02:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot, doubtful it was released under CC3.0 license Skier Dude (talk) 03:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
corporate logo, doubtful it was released under CC3.0 license Skier Dude (talk) 03:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
promotional poster, doubtful that uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Edokter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While the right image is from File:Rhossili 06 05.jpg and not a concern, I'm doubtful that the left image is anything but a screenshot from the Doctor Who episode New Earth and would be non-free. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a logo, but I couldn't find it online. Shubinator (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The background picture may have been taken by the uploader, but the logo is, well, a logo. Shubinator (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a logo, but I couldn't find it online. Shubinator (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does not have a license tag but a permission is claimed to have been filed here: hr:Wikipedija:Dozvole za korištenje sadržaja#DA Zagreb - Slike Miroslava Krleže but the permission field of the info tempate says "Exclusively for Krleža's article (...)" and while I don't speak Croatian a Google machine translation of the mails listed there seem to suggest they just asked for a "with permission" license rater than a free license. Sherool (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- na preporuku ravnatelja Drzavnog arhiva u Zagrebu javljam Vam da slobodno mozete koristiti sadrzaje s web-stranice naseg arhiva prema pravilima Wikipedije, which is in translation: "at the recommendation of the director of the State Archive in Zagreb, I inform you that you can freely use the content of our archive's wepage according to the rules of Wikipedia"
- The e-mail was sent asking specifically for permission to use the pictures of Krleža taken by Milan Pavić.
- I hope that that's enough..? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 09:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as I could determine the request only asked for a general {{permission}} to use the image on Wikipedia, no specific license where requested or given (and indeed the image does not carry any kind of license tag as required). --Sherool (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.