Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 April 6

File:Karnafuli city garden.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No PD at source. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 01:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MiladTehran06.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio uploaded multiple times. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CyrusGraveyard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio uploaded multiple times. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MiladTehran05.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio uploaded multiple times. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MiladTehran04.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio uploaded multiple times. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MiladTehran03.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio uploaded multiple times. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MiladTehran02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio uploaded multiple times. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MiladTehran01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio uploaded multiple times. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nismo-z-tune.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Spartaz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete license just goes to main Flickr page for uploader who has a long history of problematic images. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tehrangraveyard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User has persisted in uploading multiple copyvios (and is still doing so), unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CyrusGraveyard01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User has persisted in uploading multiple copyvios (and is still doing so), unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Krisjohn sonicn20040908.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted, used as non-free content. – Quadell ^(talk) 23:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly as derivative work as a photo of a box cover. A fair use rationale would not stand. J Milburn (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: All kept. – Quadell ^(talk) 21:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGnsa.jpg

scan image copyvio- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be a scan from a News paper of Magazine. Can Jayanta Nath give a source for this observation and can he explain how a picture taken many years before the invention of a digital camera can be put up in Wikipedia without scanning a picture already in my possession and for which I hold the copyright. I have not scanned any news paper or magazine and i have all the original photographs that i have uploaded in Wikipedia. . I dont know if anybody has any hidden agenda trying to remove the photos i have uploaded without any valid reason. (Kumarrajendran 06:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumarrajendran (talk • contribs) [reply]

File:Kuttykamal.jpg

copyvio - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader appears to be the adopted grandson of film star and politician M. G. Ramachandran. I strongly feel that these pictures could be from a personal collection.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is true then keep it.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be a scan from a News paper of Magazine. Can Jayanta Nath give a source for this observation and can he explain how a picture taken many years before the invention of a digital camera can be put up in Wikipedia without scanning a picture already in my possession and for which I hold the copyright. I have not scanned any news paper or magazine and i have all the original photographs that i have uploaded in Wikipedia. . I dont know if anybody has any hidden agenda trying to remove the photos i have uploaded without any valid reason. (Kumarrajendran 06:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

File:Mgrraj4.JPG

copyvio image - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader appears to be the adopted grandson of film star and politician M. G. Ramachandran. I strongly feel that these pictures could be from a personal collection.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is true then keep it.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be a scan from a News paper of Magazine. Can Jayanta Nath give a source for this observation and can he explain how a picture taken many years before the invention of a digital camera can be put up in Wikipedia without scanning a picture already in my possession and for which I hold the copyright. I have not scanned any news paper or magazine and i have all the original photographs that i have uploaded in Wikipedia. . I dont know if anybody has any hidden agenda trying to remove the photos i have uploaded without any valid reason. (Kumarrajendran 06:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumarrajendran (talk • contribs) [reply]

File:Sridevimgr.JPG

copyvio both are alive its seem to scan from newspaper/magazine - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader appears to be the adopted grandson of film star and politician M. G. Ramachandran. I strongly feel that these pictures could be from a personal collection.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is true then keep it.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be a scan from a News paper of Magazine. Can Jayanta Nath give a source for this observation and can he explain how a picture taken many years before the invention of a digital camera can be put up in Wikipedia without scanning a picture already in my possession and for which I hold the copyright. I have not scanned any news paper or magazine and i have all the original photographs that i have uploaded in Wikipedia. . I dont know if anybody has any hidden agenda trying to remove the photos i have uploaded without any valid reason. (Kumarrajendran 06:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumarrajendran (talk • contribs) [reply]

File:Jjkumar.JPG

copyvio she is alive its seem to scan from newspaper/magazine - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader appears to be the adopted grandson of film star and politician M. G. Ramachandran. I strongly feel that these pictures could be from a personal collection.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is true then keep it.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jjj.jpg

copyvio she is alive its seem to scan from newspaper/magazine or web - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader appears to be the adopted grandson of film star and politician M. G. Ramachandran. I strongly feel that these pictures could be from a personal collection.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is true then keep it.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be a scan from a News paper of Magazine. Can Jayanta Nath give a source for this observation and can he explain how a picture taken many years before the invention of a digital camera can be put up in Wikipedia without scanning a picture already in my possession and for which I hold the copyright. I have not scanned any news paper or magazine and i have all the original photographs that i have uploaded in Wikipedia. . I dont know if anybody has any hidden agenda trying to remove the photos i have uploaded without any valid reason. (Kumarrajendran 06:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumarrajendran (talk • contribs) [reply]

File:Mssaab234.jpg

copyvio its clearly shows that scan from newspaper/magazine - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is evident that the image is a scan from some piece of paper or photograph. But one cannot say for sure that it is a scan from a magazine. If it is, then could you please identify which magazine or newspaper, the picture appeared in.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry it is copyvio.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I've already said, the user has uploaded pictures from his personal collection. If at all you feel it is copyvio, please provide the link or atleast specify the magazine or newspaper from which it has been taken. Thanks-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mgr home.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

orphan and unencyclopidic - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mgr99home.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell ^(talk) 21:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio its seem to scan from newspaper/magazine - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader appears to be the adopted grandson of M. G. Ramachandran. I strongly feel that these pictures could be from a personal collection.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is true then keep it.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be a scan from a News paper of Magazine. Can Jayanta Nath give a source for this observation and can he explain how a picture taken many years before the invention of a digital camera can be put up in Wikipedia without scanning a picture already in my possession and for which I hold the copyright. I have not scanned any news paper or magazine and i have all the original photographs that i have uploaded in Wikipedia. . I dont know if anybody has any hidden agenda trying to remove the photos i have uploaded without any valid reason. (Kumarrajendran 06:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumarrajendran (talk • contribs) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MGR345676aa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell ^(talk) 21:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio its seem to scan from newspaper/magazine - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader appears to be the adopted grandson of M. G. Ramachandran. I strongly feel that these pictures could be from a personal collection.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 16:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No... We need the Picture to be here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.195.64 (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it is true then keep it.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jrrra234.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell ^(talk) 21:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio scan from newspaper/magazine and orphan - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 11:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be a scan from a News paper of Magazine. Can Jayanta Nath give a source for this observation and can he explain how a picture taken many years before the invention of a digital camera can be put up in Wikipedia without scanning a picture already in my possession and for which I hold the copyright. I have not scanned any news paper or magazine and i have all the original photographs that i have uploaded in Wikipedia. . I dont know if anybody has any hidden agenda trying to remove the photos i have uploaded without any valid reason. (Kumarrajendran 06:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumarrajendran (talk • contribs) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping garden 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping garden 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping Lake garden 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping garden 5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping garden 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20taiping.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No GFDL at source. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping Hospital Plan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No GFDL at source. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping airport.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of GFDL. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping hospital staff 3.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of GFDL. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping Hospital 2.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of GFDL. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping Hospital 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of GFDL. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Arthur Aston.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Marcus rex.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:King edward school logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of GFDL. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:St john's inst.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of GFDL, uploader has uploaded multiple non-free images under false licenses, source does not exist. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 11:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MGpamarrdma2aa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted, no evidence of violation. – Quadell ^(talk) 02:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio both are alive its seem to scan from newspaper/magazine and orphan- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 12:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see no evidence that it is from a magazine. It appears to be a scan of a photograph directly. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 12:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taiping Lake Garden 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MGRyoung22221.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell ^(talk) 21:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio its seem to scan from newspaper/magazine - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 12:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see no evidence that it is from a magazine. It appears to be a scan of a photograph directly. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 12:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be a scan from a News paper of Magazine. Can Jayanta Nath give a source for this observation and can he explain how a picture taken many years before the invention of a digital camera can be put up in Wikipedia without scanning a picture already in my possession and for which I hold the copyright. I have not scanned any news paper or magazine and i have all the original photographs that i have uploaded in Wikipedia. . I dont know if anybody has any hidden agenda trying to remove the photos i have uploaded without any valid reason. (Kumarrajendran 06:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumarrajendran (talk • contribs) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu.jpg

File:SteveSpagnuolo.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Closedmouth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getty is not GFDL. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 13:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SteveSpagnuolo cropped.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Closedmouth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getty is not GFDL. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 13:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Phillies Stretch at 2009 Spring Training.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-commercial clause at Flickr. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 15:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Paranioa.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted OS/webpage screenshot, text is not PD. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 18:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's also an orphan and appears to serve no encyclopedic purpose, only a personal one, judging from the uploader's comments. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 18:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Longoni-cues.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Almost certainly a scan from a copyrighted Longoni catalog[ue], and uploaded by a user with a long history of image upload issues. Has been copied to Commons and should be removed from there as well. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 18:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.