Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 23
November 23
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cropped version of Image:Archdeaconlamakhyimsar.jpg to remove the source watermark, which is taken from peacemala.org.uk Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Thingg (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure about this. Uploader says they took the photo but it looks like a cropped and uprezed version of this promo photo. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am about as sure I possibly can be that this is not a free image. There is almost no way the author could have taken a picture like that even today, let alone during the mid-1970s (with no digital cameras/image editing software). I saved a copy to my computer just in case there's an issue raised about it, but can't imagine there ever will be. Thingg⊕⊗ 02:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this is very likely {{PD-Pre1978}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The issue(s) are:
- Is it the original photographer who uploaded the image? Currently it says "My photo of Arrows" which does not tell us a lot. The photographer is Gered Mankowitz. As he is a professioanl photographer it would seem he would use his real name an dnot just say "My photo of Arrows"
- If the uploader is not the author than can they provide proof that Gered Mankowitz or RAK records released it into PD?
- RE the {{PD-Pre1978}} suggestion, there is not any evidence that the image was "first published in the United States without copyright notice prior to 1978". The image was used as a promo image by the label and, as the band was based in in London, England, there is no evidence to suggest that the image was not "first published" in that country. Not all promo/publicity images carry a © notice.
- I have actually sent an email to the original photographer to see if they have released their images into PD. When I receive a response I will post it here. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I deleted this and I still think it is non-free. I restored it on IronGargoyle's request, but I do not think there is any way this is free, even with pd-pre1978. Thingg⊕⊗ 20:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The issue(s) are:
- I think this is very likely {{PD-Pre1978}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This can be speedied now as it a confirmed, blatant copyvio. The photographer has said, in part,
- I do not contribute to Wikipedia and didn't upload any image of Arrows.
- There is no doubt that this image is my copyright as the original author and this is something I am quite clear about having taken legal advice from leading music business lawyers in the past.
- Thanks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's a treaty to something from 1947. I'm not sure if an image of it would be releaseable to the public domain. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, the government of Pakistan or its governor general at the time (Muhammad Ali Jinnah) would be the copyright holder. Pakistan's licensing information on Commons doesn't specify for governmental works, but non-photographic works expire 50 years after the death of the author (I would assume that it would be 50 years post-publication in the case of governmental works, or simply stay with the author him or herself). Muhammad Ali Jinnah died in 1948, so this should be in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Artist died in 1974 so not old enough enough to put in the public domain. Usage at Mar del Plata does not justify fair use. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's OK, the image should go. I uploaded the painting's pic in 2006, barely two months after my first edits on Wikipedia. At the time I believed that the public domain deadline was 30 years. Thanks.--Darius (talk) 21:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the uploader removes his copyright, I think the poster itself would have a copyright and its usage at West_Germany#Politics would not seem to qualify under fair use. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Germany has a fairly non-restrictive freedom of panorama though. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted - Not permanent. See [1]. Garion96 (talk) 21:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No indication why this comic panel would be in the public domain and current usage isn't justified by fair use. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by Mike Peel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comic book cover. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 12:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the user has also uploaded Image:Infopic.jpg, which is a duplicate of this image. -- Whpq (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Can be speedied via {{db-redundantimage}} and have added that tag. The core issue remains however as the same user also uploaded Image:Infopic.jpg. "Source" on Image:Infopic.jpg reads "I created this work entirely by myself" while Image:Veritas 012.jpg reads "I edited this work entirely by myself." The image was taken from Veritas 1, but the core website is not solely for this manga. The website carries this notice: "Copyrights © 2008 manga-news.com | Tous droits réservés. Toutes les illustrations sont sous © Copyright donc propriétés de leurs auteurs et éditeurs respectifs." which translates to "Copyright © 2008 manga-news.com | All rights reserved All illustrations are © Copyright therefore property of their respective authors and publishers." Currently the Image:Infopic.jpg image is used, but untagged. I would suggest a {{di-no permission}} to allow the user to submit an OTRS on the off chance they are the copyright holder or just go straight for the copyvio and tag with {{Db-i9}}. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader claims to be copyright holder but there is no evidence for this. Image appears to be a professional publicity still and is similar to others such as [2], and [3] where the subject is wearing the same clothes as in the uploaded image. Whpq (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems likely that it is not within the uploader's gift to release this. Stifle (talk) 16:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Self made CD cover for deleted articles "Rival" (the recording artist) and Rival (Rapper). Currently being used in the recreated article placed at User:Emceerival, which has been nominated CSD G4 based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rival (Rapper). As this image was not uploaded as fair use I am bringing it here as it is a PUI of a CD Cover which may soon be is orphaned and which would fall under {{di-orphaned fair use}} if a FUR had been used. Thanks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC) Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image. Summary says "I created this using an existing photo." No link to the original photo provided. Source image is from Nowrunning according to Image:Asinthottumkal.JPG. However there is no indication on the website that any material is licensed under a CCL. The image seems to be The image is cropped from Wallpaper. (I have i9'd it as no permission came in for the unmodified version) Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.