Wikipedia:Peer review/Raff & Gammon/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I wonder what other people will think about it. I am worried that there is something wrong with the article and I need someone to help me out. I also doing this to learn more about creating articles and how I can create a better one.
Sincerely, Analog Horror, (Speak) 03:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Comments from Thatoneweirdwikier
[edit]Apologies for the long wait! Here are a few of my comments:
- Generally, it should be clear as to whether "Raff & Gammon" means "the company" or "the founders".
- "...who were really interested in it..." Remove the word "really".
- Personally, I think the section "Fall of the Kinetoscope Company" needs to be more neutral.
That's honestly it. I might take a look to see if there are any other sources that can help to expand the article. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 10:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Extra references
[edit]Below, I've listed some references that may help to expand the article:
- "Raff and Gammon". BFI. Retrieved 2020-05-14.
- "Guide to Motion Picture Catalogs - The Edison Papers". edison.rutgers.edu. Retrieved 2020-05-14.
- Musser, Charles (1994-05-04). The Emergence of Cinema: The American Screen to 1907. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-08533-6.
- "Before the Nickelodeon". publishing.cdlib.org. Retrieved 2020-05-14.
- Balio, Tino (1985-03-04). The American Film Industry. Univ of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-09873-5.
- Musser, Charles; Nelson, Carol (2015-03-08). High-Class Moving Pictures: Lyman H. Howe and the Forgotten Era of Traveling Exhibition, 1880-1920. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-7272-5.
- Hope this helps. Thatone
weirdwikier | Say hi 10:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)