Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance

This article contains no sources that are not already included in electronic harassment. The creator has repeatedly tried to instigate voice to skull as well, a POVfork of the former article. The sources do not constitute non-trivial coverage of the subject of this requested article (two namechecks, two do not even mention the subject), instead they are sympathetic portrayals of the phenomenon of "electronic harassment", cherry-picked from the many sources which identify the phenomenon as delusional. Basically, this is a group of no provable significance which exists to advocate freedom from something that has no provable existence outside the imagination of people who are, according to the evidence, usually diagnosed as mentally ill. Guy (Help!) 13:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promotional nonsense on a fringe topic. The FFCHS group is not notable—the sources do not show any notability. The group is promoting itself on Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 18:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing even approximating to the in-depth coverage needed to meet notability guidelines. Normally, I'd suggest allowing a little leeway in AfC for further sources to be found, but there seems no realistic prospect of this happening, and it seems quite obvious that the object of this article is to further promote a fringe theory that simply doesn't belong on Wikipedia. In the unlikely event that sufficient sourcing is ever found to justify an article on this group, the article would of course need a complete rewrite anyway, as it completely fails to adhere to WP:NPOV policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability of group not met per WP:ORG. Seems like another attempt to get fringe "voice to skull" POV into Wikipedia. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.