Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikiproject The Prodigy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete, no point in stringing this one out, even though I was invited to join the project (bizarrely...). Let me know if I miss any of the subpages etc. Bencherlite ^Talk 12:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikiproject The Prodigy

Moribund "project" with only one member, now permanently banned User:Guitarherochristopher (See user page for information on the ban). A search of his deleted contributions will reveal a few other "myspacey" user and project pages which have been deleted at MfD. Protonk (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A project whose sole member is permanently banned serves no purpose whatsover, other than to encourage that user to evade his ban. PC78 (talk) 00:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is as dead-end a project as it gets; created by one editor, who is the sole participant, and now indefinitely blocked. -- Atama頭 01:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Tan | 39 01:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No reason to keep pages of banned editors around. ArcAngel (talk) 01:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reason to keep banned user's pages around.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 01:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 01:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete @Kate (talk) 08:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.