Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Noticeboard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep as historical archive. A hatnote or link to a current alternative might be helpful, though. Tikiwont (talk) 10:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Noticeboard[edit]

This is an obsolete page/noticeboard which has been inactive for over two years. In addition, this noticeboard has been replaced by having various discussions on either the WikiProject's discussion page or on separate article talk pages. MuZemike (talk) 03:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 03:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tag as historical I see no reason why to delete this. hbdragon88 (talk) 03:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This has been marked as historical for quite a while now. Why should we delete it? Pagra shtak 17:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm a little indifferent about the page. I understand the desire to delete this page, but since it does serve a historical/archival purpose it should probably stay. However, if something must be done, I'd recommend adding the requests to a VG Project talk page archive and redirect the notice board to WT:VG. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 18:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Yes I like that idea. I believe we did something similar a little while back if I remember correctly, and it worked okay. --.:Alex :. 10:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that does sound like a good idea. - jc37 21:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, tagged as historical. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - What is the point of keeping as historical? It is not as though it is an archive of any discussion or useful information. It is merely a posting of a couple of articles that needed work two years ago. I see no purpose in keeping it around. JohnnyMrNinja 13:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Archive and redirect per User:Guyinblack25. - jc37 21:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Don't most projects have a noticeboard? Given that there are notices on it, and it is customary to have one I say keep it. Even if it's not being used. --Carbonrodney (talk) 07:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It has pretty much been superseded by Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/to do ~ JohnnyMrNinja 04:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as it says "This Wikipedia page is currently inactive and is retained as a historical archive." Mathmo ^Talk 05:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It was tagged as historical almost two years ago. There is no reason to delete. Paragon12321 (talk) 01:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.