Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tales of

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete —Ree dy 16:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tales of[edit]

Also nominated: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tales of.

This is another clean up effort for the Video games' inactive project clean up task force. The page nominated has been tagged as inactive since February 2008 and has no substantive edit history on either the main page or the talk page, which similarly indicates little to no interest. Should interest arise, I also believe that it would work better as a task force of WP:VG.

If someone wants to, they can recreate it in the future, but with so few edits (12 in total?, a few of which are bot edits), I see no reason to do so. Even redirecting isn't really plausible with no sizable edit history, I feel. Izno (talk) 05:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete — I agree, if it's not needed for anything in the project anymore. MuZemike (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. JohnnyMrNinja 08:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-proposed or supported project. It doesn't even appear to be filled-out properly. Note that the editor in question still appears to be very active in "Tales of" articles, though when the project was mentioned at WT:VG (by myself) there was no other interest expressed. If, at some point, interest does arise, it can be re-created. JohnnyMrNinja 08:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'd equate this to the WikiProject Dynasty Warriors (MfD). It is a small scope project that never really got off the ground for what ever reason. There is no discussion history (2 edits: 1 bot notice and 1 page move), the project page only has a short history of design edits and Wikipedia related maintenance. At the very least, it could be moved to a task force under WP:VG, but I'm in favor of deleting it. And as Izno has stated, it would probably work better as a task force should interest increases down the road. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 16:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]
I actually borrowed some of your phraseology from that particular MfD. Hope you don't mind. :) --Izno (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not at all. The wording and reasoning work here as well, and I agree with it completely. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 21:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Delete: For the reasons above. I think that it's lack of history, content and inactivity means that it is unnecessary and unsuitable to redirect. Natcong (talk) 20:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unsupported project that can easily be recreated if interest picks up. DigitalC (talk) 07:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.