Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Userboxes/Loves outlines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Userboxes/Loves outlines

Zero translutions userboxes, which pretty much confirms very few people support this Wikiproject. Cleanup Legacypac (talk) 20:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac: the userbox is transcluded on @Hellais's user page; that editor hasn't edited in 7+ years, but zero transclusions is wrong --DannyS712 (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, maybe I misread the report that showed zero. Anyway effectively not being used. That user has 16 total lifetime edits including adding a bunch of userboxes to their page. Legacypac (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is more debris from an earlier frolic by TTH. (What are translutions? Are they translations from a Lusophone language? If so, send them back to the Portuguese Wikipedia. Delete anyway.) Robert McClenon (talk) 22:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: What is TTH? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Transhuminist the user behind the mass Portal expansion which is a replay of the Outline project Legacypac (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As Legacypac says, that is User:The Transhumanist. Also a frolic is a term of law, although it does not really apply because TTH was not acting as an employee of anyone. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Unless I'm missing something, these are standard userboxes produced for a WikiProject. Where is it written that if nobody is presently transcluding them, nobody is allowed to in the future, when they're perfectly relevant to the WikiProject? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This Wikiproject is full of useless junk, and some of us have started deleting the most useless parts of it. Legacypac (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Archive, but do not delete. WikiProjects should be self-managing, not managed from MfD. When a WikiProject winds up, as this one should, it should be archived. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Keep per SmokeyJoe above. The userboxes are causing no harm. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.