Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh Navy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/South Asian military history task force. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh Navy

Dead project, no activity. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 20:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/South Asian military history task force, as was suggested on the talk page eight months ago. Hut 8.5 21:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing to save. Only had one member. Nothing to be gained by redirecting. --Klein zach 23:51, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Decent scope, current version is useful as a non-trivial resource. This WikiProject is suitable for revival. No objection to merging to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/South Asian military history task force as suggested on the talk page, if someone involved and committed does it, but I think a simple redirection is a poor idea. If a redirect were suitable, redirection to Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh would be better. However, there is nothing inherently wrong with the project. While inactive, leave it tagged {{inactive}}. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A total of 19 Bangladeshi naval vessels have their own articles. Can we really call this "decent scope", SmokeyJoe? --Klein zach 09:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

19 existing articles, and a larger number of potential articles on ships (I guess from the red-links), plus other articles associated with the navy, such as personal or actions. The coverage of this sort of thing only grows with time. There is also western bias of editors that is worth worrying about. A large navy is a much bigger deal than the band wikiProject we sometimes see. However, by "decent", I mean not woefully small. The number of associated articles and possible articles is not so small as to immediately classify the project as too-limited. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete inactive, stillborn, never did anything and never will since only 19 articles exist on the topic. If there are more potential articles that such a project could cover, they should exist first, not the project. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/South Asian military history task force, since a south asian country's navy is similar to the task force. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ← Contribs 10:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/South Asian military history task force, because this is inactive, there is only one contributor, etc.. --24.14.73.183 (talk) 02:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.