Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient European history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient European history[edit]

Creator of the project is now at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tom.mevlie and listed as a confirmed sock puppeteer of one of the other listed members, and suspected of being the sockpuppeteer of the other. Creator has also indicated on his user talk page that "there are some problems with wikipedia which can only be solved by staunch fascism. i could do it, i would run it a damn signt better than how it is being run now, i can tell you that." It is not unreasonable to suspect that this project might exist to further those aims. Project is also redundant to extant active Wikipedia:WikiProject European history. Suggest deletion of project and all subpages. Creator of the page has been notified of this discussion. John Carter (talk) 17:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Project is incomplete, never proposed (yes, I know that's not required), and has only 3 members, two of whom are listed as suspected sockpuppets of the creator (and the other is the creator).--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 18:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While I would normally advocate folding this into the European history project, it looks like there are issues here involving the user who created the page, being the sockmaster of the other two "participants" of the project. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 18:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete With no active contributors (2 of the members being socks and Tom.mevlie having announced that he is abandoning that account) and no content (it never even got fully started) it does not do anything but cause confusion. Also, there are already several wikiprojects that cover this area (in part or fully). Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 20:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sockpuppeteering aside, WP:eurohist encompasses this directly. Virtually no relevant material to merge. Tanthalas39 (talk) 20:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.