Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Vital articles/Frequently Asked Questions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Redirect * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Vital articles/Frequently Asked Questions

We now have a landing page that answers the FAQ pretty well. Interstellarity (talk) 09:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~. I have moved the useful 'Crewbot part' of this page to the new landing page in the maintenance section, so there is little else needed. I think better to rationalize these redundant pages on this project to avoid editors landing on wrong/dead pages. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and blank per Graham87 below. That will solve the problem and avoid any confusion that it is now a redundant page. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the value of article history, particularly as it relates to the landing page and the rest of the Vital Articles project. Air on White (talk) 19:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wikipedia:Vital articles: since text has been moved, the history needs to be kept for attribution purposes. Graham87 (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that would work for all. Aszx5000 (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Blank and redirect per Graham87. Don't see any reason to delete it and preserving the history and attribution has some obvious advantages. Skynxnex (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:Vital articles/Frequently Asked Questions, 79 pages link to this. That's too much to just delete. Air on White (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. The page still has a few dozen links to it, and marking it as historical should get across that the information is outdated. Your local Sink Cat 00:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wikipedia:Vital articles: Per above: page history should be kept and link count is too high to delete anyways. I don't see any disadvantages to redirecting. C F A 💬 23:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Was used. Wikipedia history should not be deleted. Archive, redirect, update, but keep the history available in the history. SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.