Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stonemason89
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G6, uncontroversial maintenance for SPI. T. Canens (talk) 22:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stonemason89[edit]
This frivolous and retaliatory report has no use other than to show that someone was angry at Stonemason89. I'm also MFDing the archive page for the same reasons.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete both. The SPI case is clearly retaliatory and seeing as the filer is now blocked it does not really need to be kept to document their behaviour. Tiptoety talk 05:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't like deleting something like this. Yes, it was a bad faith investigation, but it was closed immediately, and I don't really think there's any harm in keeping it. What's the precedent for things like this? Buddy431 (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.