Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules have exceptions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Rules have exceptions

Four year old unstarted/blank essay, discovered by accident as it has a shortcut. Should be deleted ~~or at least userifed without the shortcut~~JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed after nominating this that its creator User:Antaeus Feldspar hasn't edited for more than eighteen months, seemingly retired, in which case there is no point moving it to that user's space, so I will change my recommendation to delete.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 18:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. MER-C 07:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Would have been better speedily userfied. How many of us really should be checking the incoming links and depth of conversation on the talk page before deciding that there is nothing here? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.