Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Peer review/Bhagavad Gita/archive1
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by submittor Achowat (talk) 20:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Not at all necessary! The article is not ready we know and we are working in the article! Someone unnecessarily requested a peer review! Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 11:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Review does no harm. Any editor should be allowed to ask others to look at a page and give frank opinions on it. Keep. Achowat (talk) 14:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- But the editor who has requested the review is not a (major) contributor of the article. We are going to make some major changes in the article. Right now no third opinion is necessary! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 14:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'd comment on the Peer Review and let them know that. Outright deletion seems a brash over-reaction. Achowat (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- I thought everybody could do with some help.Exposing the article to more people will only help improve it.I agree i am not a major contributor but review doesn't harm the article,you can continue to work on it,the review is not a hurdle but only a help in your path. Ayanosh (talk) 10:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree it is a bit over-reaction, sorry, (I am not very sure how to withdraw the request)! After the recent edit dispute related to ISCKON content (see talk of the article) a large portion of the article has been deleted. You can see this edit comparison. There are multiple deadrefs, multiple section with incomplete/confusing information etc. We know that we have to revise the whole article. A review will be helpful when we'll finish these works! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 10:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.