Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Lightbringer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn here. Jesse Viviano 22:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Lightbringer

We don't need these elaborate pages giving a hall of fame to blatant vandals - if someone is blatantly compromising the integrity of the encyclopedia, we block them. Similar pages (Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Willy on Wheels/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Mr. Pelican Shit) also got deleted, so I don't see why this should stay. Note: I'm going through the Wikipedia vandalism category and listing all these related pages for mfd. --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 10:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He survived the last round of deletions, so he should stay for this time, too. Also he used to have a big flashing picture and it's not there now and I can't find it in the history. Anomo 12:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first "Lightbringer" was Image:light.jpg, the "flashing" one was Image:Xenon-flash.gif. 68.39.174.238 01:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This user is not a vandal, he is a POV edit warrior who is incivil. He is a long-term problem. --SunStar Net^talk 12:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. These types of pages are indispensable for helping admins unfamiliar with the history of a problem user get an accurate view of the situation if a new problem arises. MSJapan 20:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He is both a POV edit warrior and a vandal. He has proved to be a huge problem for nearly two years. Just because he's taken a break for two months, don't think he's gone Chtirrell 04:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The page is vital to helping admins identify and track the problems with this user. Blueboar 15:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per everybody above. WegianWarrior 20:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as previously identified.ALR 21:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I don't mean to seem rude, but it seems odd that this user is complaining about this page giving publicity to vandals and yet he has stuff on his userpage saying that "Willy on Wheels" is his favorite editor other things like that.--Azer Red Si? 02:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.