Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mr. Treason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. @harej 00:17, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mr. Treason[edit]

This user is apparently no longer active. Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 18:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't know about this. Should we really delete LTA pages, just in case they come back one day? --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:45, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If I remember correctly, the official policy is to delete after one year of inactivity. Mr. Treason has been gone way longer than that. --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 18:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for historical reasons. Crafty (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but blank. Ruslik_Zero 19:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What's the point in blanking the page? --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 19:33, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy blanking is often used in situations such as this. Crafty (talk) 19:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't see how that applies here.. --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 19:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deleting LTA pages is generally a bad idea, but it could be blanked per Ruslik0. @Kate (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Craftyminion. Jclemens (talk) 21:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Though I know of no way one can be sure the user will not reappear/has not reappeared. Mark as historical at most. Collect (talk) 22:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree entirely with Collect, for once. Really, there's no valid reason to delete here that I can see. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.