Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MLG troll

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 05:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MLG troll[edit]

No indication that this will be an LTA - SPI is less than a week old. As per WP:LONG "Only add vandals that have a need to be pointed out, such as sneaky sockpuppeteers, prolific trolls, etc." Nthep (talk) 08:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Trust User:Nthep, ask KATMAKROFAN to refer future troll problems to User:Nthep, or another admin. User:KATMAKROFAN seems to be one with their heart in the right place, but a bit over eager in their editing, and should slow down when it comes to compiling reports on others. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. First, thanks to KATMAKROFAN for reporting this vandal and identifying its socks. But, as the nom says, one recent SPI does not quality for an LTA listing. Regarding the request to userfy, the guideline at WP:UP#POLEMIC discourages keeping user pages to document misbehavior of other users unless it is going to be used in upcoming dispute resolution. Since the SPI is closed and the relevant accounts blocked, there is no justification to keep this as a user page. --RL0919 (talk) 22:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.