Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion of newly created pages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion of newly created pages[edit]

Should be deleted since it is dependent on {{New page}} which was redirected to {{Under construction}} in September 2017 after discussion, and the current deletion process for new pages isn't the one listed on the page. PorkchopGMX2 (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a not very good idea that has been superseded by events. Legacypac (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it's an historical record of a failed proposal and marked as such. There is no need to delete this. -- Whpq (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a failed proposal, for the record. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. we keep failed proposals as a guide, because they ntend to be perennnials. DGG ( talk ) 23:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We don't delete failed proposals, we don't delete bad ideas, doing so would doom future editors to repeat the same mistakes. Records are important. Failed proposals if offensive can be blanked, but this is not offensive. I do must on whether all failed proposals should be renamed with a "(fail proposal)" suffix, rename this to Wikipedia:Deletion of newly created pages (failed proposal), given how easily people try to impress others with bluelinks, and to clearly distinguish failed proposals from essays elaborating on minority opinions. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm all for deleting crap but I'm also for keeping historical items such as this, This was created 10 years ago and since then this website has come a long way. Easy keep for me. –Davey2010^Talk 18:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.