Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Conservative Wikipedians

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close. @LilBillWilliams: This MFD wasn't formatted correctly whatsoever. For future reference, please follow the instructions on the main MFD page. No prejudice against renomination. (non-admin closure)MJLTalk 17:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This article has no real purpose other than to make fun of conservatives. Many people don't notice the warning at the top saying "this article is humorous" and take it to be true. It does not add anything to Wikipedia, other than confusion. It also makes it seem like all conservatives hate liberals, which is a bad assertion to make. Saying that all conservatives hate liberals should not belong in any Wikipedia article. So again, because this article has no real purpose other than to be "funny", and since it confuses many people (especially kids, since they don't understand that it is a joke), and also because it says that conservatives all hate liberals, which is a horrible stereotype to make, I think it should just be deleted. BobRoberts14 (talk) 09:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)BobRoberts14[reply]

It just makes it seem as if all conservative editors are ignorant people who take everything liberals say as false, and that they will revert any leftist edits, even if they are true. That is completely false, and is not something to "joke" about, especially when many people don't notice that it is a joke. If someone were to make an article called Black Wikipedians, and in that article say "Black Wikipedians will revert anything a White Wikipedian says, even if it is true, because white people can't be trusted" they would immediately get their article removed, because it would be promoting bad stereotypes. So why should this article be allowed to stay if it is just causing hate? BobRoberts14 (talk) 09:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)BobRoberts14[reply]

"Important work in evolutionary biology These editors often make important contributions on articles dealing with evolutionary theory. Such examples include Sociobiological theories of rape, Biology and political orientation and Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence." that is completely offensive and not something to joke about. Again, this article is just made by some random person who thought it was funny. It isn't, it's just offensive. Rape isn't a joke, and pretending like conservatives never trust liberals isn't a joke either. This article does not benefit Wikipedia at all, since it isn't funny, is very confusing, since some people may not know that it is supposed to be a "joke", and it is very offensive in the way that is portrays conservatives as paranoid and ignorant people who all hate liberals. There are many reasons as to why this article should be deleted, but the biggest one is that it does not benefit Wikipedia or its readers at all. BobRoberts14 (talk) 09:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)BobRoberts14[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.