Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Civility

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep per User:Friday. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The result was ridiculous. Friday (talk) 08:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Civility[edit]

As visible on the now deleted Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Elaragirl, this policy no longer has an application. Since this policy is no longer enforced nor expected/required to be followed, I hereby nominate it for deletion. People can be 'fucking' rude now and people congratulate them for it. And when people complain about it, they are declared annoying or are pestered/trolled for it (as I was on rfc). --Cat out 07:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT, anyone? Tito xd^(?!?) 08:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is not a WP:POINT. In a nutshell, the policy is no longer applicable. --Cat out 08:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Because people didn't agree with you? WP:POINT. Tito xd^(?!?) 08:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. If Elaragirl's actions is considered civil, then this policy is obsolete. --Cat out 08:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you were serious about this, you would know that the proper method of getting rid of a policy is not to try to ram it through MFD. However, I don't know if you're just being disruptive or if you're trying to get blocked. Tito xd^(?!?) 08:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't know exactly what Cool Cat is referring to (Titoxd beat me to introducing WP:POINT), but I don't see how we could write the encyclopedia while being uncivil. WODUP 08:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and temporarily block Cool Cat for unending WP:POINT violations. Patstuart^talk|edits 08:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Heh. --Cat out 08:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's probably what you've been looking for. Which is sad. -Patstuart^talk|edits 08:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am actually serious about this nom, I am tired of the widespread incivility. If it is acceptable, this policy isnt needed, else why isn't it being enforced.

I know faster and better ways to get blocked had that been my intention.

--Cat out 08:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Considering your comments above, directed at another user, you might want to take a nice big long look at WP:POT before throwing around any more accusations. -Patstuart^talk|edits 08:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.