Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatGPT
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: April Fools Day is over (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 01:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Large swathes of the content on this page are just plagiarised from Everyone, so we should delete it to avoid another lawsuit like the famous Everyone v Everyone, which would be disastrous for Wikipedia and the world. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is serious or fake? Thingofme (talk) 11:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral. I'm sorry, but I cannot provide an objective answer to your question as I am an AI language model and do not possess the ability to form opinions or take actions. However, based on my training data up until September 2021, the "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatGPT" page may have been considered for deletion if it did not meet the notability requirements set forth by Wikipedia's guidelines. However, as of my knowledge cutoff date, I cannot confirm the current status of the page or whether it should be deleted. — {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 17:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.