Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Marie Charlotte de la Trémoille

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete for now On it's face that may not look like the right result, but let us consider the following:

Redirecting from the incubator to mainspace accomplishes nothing as it is extremely unlikely such a redirect would ever help a reader find the related article.
The incubator was a well-intentioned project that has clearly failed, this page being a prime example as it was moved into it thirty-five months ago and has had no substantive edits since then. So, it's had lots of time time well outside of one user's userspace and no effort has been put into it.
If there is a user who is willing to work on this (as opposed to the suggestion that someone could work on it) I would be happy to re-userfy it for that user, just ask me on my talk page.

Beeblebrox (talk) 15:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Marie Charlotte de la Trémoille[edit]

According to Wikipedia:Article_Incubator#Time_limit, [c]ontent intended for mainspace should not be kept forever on subpages, ... This article has not been edited for over 12 months. Should be deleted per WP:STALEDRAFT. Illia Connell (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See comment on talk page: Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Marie Charlotte de la Trémoille Illia Connell (talk) 06:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Of questionable notability, and it's been untouched since 2011. If anyone wanted to save this content, they would have done so by now. Robofish (talk) 21:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bernhard II, Duke of Saxe-Jena, her husband. Most of this draft is about him in any case. DGG ( talk ) 04:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my content on the talk page, to wit: This stub is reasonably far along and is a worthwhile topic, for which sources exist. I believe that additional time should be allowed for other editors to add content and cites. She belonged to a Huguenot princely family, whose marriage to a Protestant German prince was rare and controversial at the time. She is described on p. 171 of volume IV of Père Anselme's respected Histoire de la Maison Royale de France et des Grands Officiers de la Couronne. I suspect I'm not the only historical bio editor who was unaware the stub existed because it has been nested in the user space of a long-banned editor. Time, not deleteion, is needed here. FactStraight (talk) 05:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.