Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Englishjustice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete; I have found a consensus to blank the inappropriate content, however. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Englishjustice[edit]

WP:STALEDRAFT Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep the page in place. There are messages from other editors on this user talk page, and if the page were deleted, those messages would disappear too. The draft content can be blanked, though. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the messages are deletion warnings that are inconsequential if removed. The rest of the content is just a 4 year old stale draft. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There would be a case for simple blanking if the user had significant editing history away from their userspace - unfortunately, the reality is different. User has a grand total of six edits (all but one to this page) and hasn't edited in more than four years. Classic example of WP:STALEDRAFT; unsourced and non-notable subject that would almost certainly fall at the first AfD hurdle in article space. Super Mario Man 22:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Blank the inappropriate content, leave the messages. The "need" for deletion here is outweighed by the preference to not delete talk page history, a preference that exists so that editors can easily check for past messages and past interactions. That the warnings are now inconsequential is beside the point, the absence of messages in the history is also important to preserve. As the user is long-since inactive, and the material (relating to a non-notable political group based in the Telford area of shropshire) is not in any way offensive, blanking the old draft content is more than good enough a solution. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.