Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:99.54.138.81

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was blank. --BDD (talk) 20:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:99.54.138.81[edit]

Inarguably one of the worst uses of a talk page in my opinion ever, and it's where NOT to put event archives to. I don't want to push it too far and hurt a banned IP, but it seems like the use of a test page, or an inappropriate talk page use, but salt it after it is deleted??? StormContent 18:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but note that I've edited the page and semi-protected it to prevent new improper use. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I know. StormContent 19:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - User talk pages are generally not deleted. See WP:DELTALK. Arthur Rubin protected the talk page about two years ago on 31 August 2011.[1] User:99.54.138.81 is not blocked, etc.[2] The last talk edit on the page was more than a year ago on 20 June 2012‎. Has something changed so that the talk page should be deleted? -- Jreferee (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
99.54.138.81 would be blocked, if he were to return, as a sock of the multiple IPs which should be blocked until at least mid-2014, now. He wasn't blocked in 2011, as the blocks didn't start until early 2012. And there seems to be a move to delete inactive IP talk pages
Keep and blank - there's no basis in policy to delete a user talk page. In fact, WP:DELTALK, which is policy, explicitly says otherwise. I would definitely be okay with blanking the page, but not deleting it. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this IP user has been blocked, saying it is an account used by User:XB70Valyrie, ... so is this a list of contributions by blocked user XB70Valyrie (talk · contribs) ? -- 65.92.182.123 (talk) 03:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I get it now. User pages are not normally deleted (however this is an exception), but can either be blanked and/or moved as stated by Wikipedia's DELTALK policy. Does anyone support my message? StormContent 20:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct! :) — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 21:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or blank, I don't really care either way but the content should go away. Also, are we thinking that banned user XB70Valyrie is the same IP hopping sock with the hundreds of addresses listed at User:Arthur Rubin/IP list? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 01:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.