Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:98.88.23.235

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete, with no prejudice to recreating the page if it is needed (for example, if someone else uses the IP and needs to be engaged or welcomed). –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 19:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:98.88.23.235[edit]

User page created for the current floating IP that I am using while on vacation. I made some edits and did not feel like logging in. --CaveatLector Talk Contrib 06:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the only person who's edited from that IP in the last few months? If so, I'll blank the page if it bothers you, although the content seems pretty harmless. A formal MfD is, in any event, not necessary. Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fairly certain that this IP is unique to my family's provider. I can't guarantee that the ISP doesn't float it around, however. It doesn't *bother* me per se, as much as it just takes up WikiSpace. I would have gone for a Speedy, but I don't think User Pages can be speedy deleted, correct? CaveatLector Talk Contrib 08:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They can be (see WP:CSD#General and WP:CSD#User) but this doesn't meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep absent any real reason to delete. CaveatLector is free to blank it, I guess, although I don't see the point. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Loath to delete a talk page, even though this is a pretty fine splinter at the thin end of a wedge. On the other hand, some people have thought that old IP talk pages should be routinely deleted. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; if the user wants it gone, then get rid of it, although it's just a harmless welcome template. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 00:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per CaveatLector (talk · contribs)'s request. The talk page does not contain any useful history. Cunard (talk) 03:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.