Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:2804:389:6028:9F91:F4B9:BC23:38AA:E6E0/sandbox for user warnings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:2804:389:6028:9F91:F4B9:BC23:38AA:E6E0/sandbox for user warnings[edit]

This isn't the example IPV6 address listed on the User warning sandbox. If anyone knows why this address also has a user warning sandbox, please enlighten us all? Unless there is some reason for this to be kept, it should be deleted to avoid confusion with the real one. Mako001 (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy blank and move on. Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 04:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pointless, unused, and potentially confusing, so delete. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blank, or redirect back to the usertalk page itself. If I had to guess, this probably exists because someone was going through one of the tutorials which often direct you to create sandboxes in your userspace. Anyway there's no WP:DELREASON or any cause to take up community time with an mfd for this, nominator has not explained why the history needs to be hidden. The only reason this is an issue at all is becuase it's currently polluting some categories, but that can be taken care of without taking up community time by blanking or redirecting. Regards, 213.193.27.121 (talk) 20:13, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.