Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Znarky/Hoosch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Znarky/Hoosch[edit]

Delete This was an article tagged for speedy deletion and then speedy-deleted. It was userfied on 1 July 2010 on request from the author, who said he wanted "improve the article with better references". It was made explicit to the user at the time that this was a temporary measure for that purpose only. In fact since userfication the user has not edited the page at all. There is no evidence of notability. None of the "references" even mentions "Hoosch" at all. After three months without any attempt at all to add sources it is time to end this "temporary" chance to do so. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete basically an ad. Gigs (talk) 20:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This seems to happen all too often... --ais523 21:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete I like to give editors some leeway to work on drafts, but three months and still zero edits just doesn't sound like a serious effort. --SPhilbrickT 17:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Userspace is not for indefinite storage of deleted content. MER-C 07:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Undo. As somebody who likes to accommodate requests for userfication, I tend to think that it also can be undone by the restoring admin in such obvious circumstances as most other actions can be undone. In the sense of moving it back to main space, redelete it and drop the author a friendly note to request restoration once more if they have some sources and are actually ready to go. --Tikiwont (talk) 07:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.