Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zhxy 519/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 03:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zhxy 519/sandbox[edit]

User:Zhxy 519/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1097#m:Requests_for_comment/Global_de-adminship_for_Jusjih, there are concerns that this sandbox looks like an attack page and tones are inappropriate for us, shouldn't we encourage that user to re-write to avoid too strong tones? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete attack page with no obvious value Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The RFC this was created for was closed as unactionable m:Requests for comment/De-adminship for Jusjih in certain projects. I fail to see why the English wikipedia should host a laundry list of grievances dating back to 2007 based entirely on events that took place on other projects, per WP:Attack page On the other hand, keeping a "list of enemies" or "list of everything bad user:XXX did" on your user space is neither constructive nor appropriate. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above comments, and because it appears that the author wants to restart an RFC on a User, a procedure that has been disbanded for various reasons including creating more heat than light. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It is empty now. It is a draft of previous rfc and I'm not "to restart an RFC on a User". You can check page's history first. Zhxy 519 (talk) 23:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Zhxy 519 Please do not remove deletion tag while this discussion is ongoing Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Anyway, for later users participant this discussion, they may read what this page was via Special:Diff/1092386268. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.