Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yimingbao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep without any prejudice for speedy deletion on request of Yimingbao in the future. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yimingbao[edit]

~~Unuseful user page, only with distruptive contents. 333 -blue 14:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Neutral, leaning keep The page came blue because of a mistaken talk page comment. It doesn't really matter but some editors like their usernames to be red. ~~The dumb comment was placed by the editor. If the editor wants it deleted, they can make a db-author request. -- 23:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

I was mistaken. The edit was done by a sock and should be reverted. Still leaning keep then. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, presuming reasonable leeway, noting that the nomination statement is unsubstantiated and a quick review reveals no such problem. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No grounds to ~~remove~~ delete this. Note that the comment was not added by the page's owner. It was added by the similar-looking user:Yimingguo. That account is blocked but Yimingbao is not listed as one of the socks. Yimingbao is not blocked, and was active as of yesterday. He or she can blank the page or ask to have it deleted as wished. Meters (talk) 22:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revert the edit as vandalism if anything. Meters (talk) 22:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I reverted the vandalism. 333-blue is there a reason to delete this anymore? Are you requesting the hiding of the edit itself? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The nominator struck his nomination after Ricky81682 left the above Updatet, and deleted a request for clarification on his talk page. This should be closed as either "Keep" or "Withdrawn". Meters (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.