Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wickham01/new article name here

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Merge and redirect. — xaosflux Talk 17:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wickham01/new article name here[edit]

User:Wickham01/new article name here (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

At the bottom you can see this is WP:OR Not suitable for the project. Stale draft. Legacypac (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • OR is definitely not a deletion reason for a userspace draft. There may still be good reason to delete... --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • History merge into Mike Stuart Span. This was created in January 2010 and that version was obviously from somewhere and I suspect this page ("Several grammatical and textual changes, plus additionaal research" is not an edit summary for a new article) or both are stealing from another place but it's not clear where. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • History merge into Mike Stuart Span. I does very much look like the userpage was copied. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.