Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Webstrike/Frosteam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Webstrike/Frosteam[edit]

Should be deleted as G11 or U5 or per WP:FAKEARTICLE, for U5 it was said "creator has made edits outside userspace" but not really exactly true, all of their edits are "promotion only", all but one article created by them were already deleted as promo or non-notable and I nominated the last one which will most likely be deleted as well, this is a spam page of something that was deleted as non-notable already: [1], WP:FAKEARTICLE says: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content", "Pages that preserve material previously deleted, without an active attempt to address the reasons for deletion, if left live, may be deleted", "Blatant promotional content may qualify for db-g11 tagging. Clearly inappropriate content created by non-genuine contributors should be tagged with db-u5.", WP:STALEDRAFT was pointed to say "let it be" for this reason but WP:STALEDRAFT says: "if the draft is not problematic (e.g. no BLP, reliability, promotional issues)" (this is problematic with "promotional issues"), "if the draft has no potential and is problematic even if blanked, seek deletion.", "User space drafts prevented from being moved to the main space only because of the GNG are not to be kept indefinitely", anyway, the bottom line, I think it's clearly a G11 deletion. Tehonk (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No purpose, not a feasible draft, no reason to host it here. —DIYeditor (talk) 02:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete although a trout to the nominator is in order for rag picking. This is a user subpage that looks like a stub article, and is more like a draft than like anything else. Drafts last for six months. There is no need to keep this for 13 years, or for 5 years after the last edit by the user. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.