Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vladyslava.p/sandbox
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:UP#COPIES, this is a temporary duplicate version of Internet sex addiction from April 2013. The editor here seems to have incorporated their work here in this edit. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- maybe im stupid but i don't understand what the issue is here. Spartaz Humbug! 16:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- There's no CSD template that would get rid of this page, so MFD is the only option for me. It's keeping another version of the article that's problematic. This version hasn't been edited but sometimes you end up with parallel versions of articles which doesn't help. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- I can't see the problem myself. so what if a former contributor leaves an old draft in user space. There is no real benefit from its deletion. It doesn't save space in the data base and doesn't seem to infringe any policy I know of. Why is is it problematic or unhelpful? Spartaz Humbug! 17:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- There's no CSD template that would get rid of this page, so MFD is the only option for me. It's keeping another version of the article that's problematic. This version hasn't been edited but sometimes you end up with parallel versions of articles which doesn't help. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The user wrote up draft language for an article in their sandbox, then (properly) edited the article to incorporate it, then went away without G7-ing the draft text. Technically not a stale draft, but just as useless. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as useless "draft" (It's not really a draft but whatever!). –Davey2010Talk 23:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.