Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Travisharger/Misty Edwards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was deleted by JzG. JohnCD (talk) 19:57, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Travisharger/Misty Edwards[edit]

WP:STALEDRAFT. The article has been deleted twice (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misty Edwards, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misty Edwards 2), and the present deletion review discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 July 1#Misty Edwards thus far is supporting the second deletion of the content.

Also, per the second deletion discussion, the subject subject has requested deletion via OTRS Ticket#2015061610000912. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:18, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a low-notability BLP that the subject apparently wants deleted, there's no reason to let it sit even in userspace. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted it. it has no chance given recent deletions. The user needs to drop the stick and back away. Guy (Help!) 23:38, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any especial reason to keep this around, but... what stick? The primary author here, and user whose space this was in, hasn't edited since early January 2010, and the only nonbot edit to it since January 2011 was me noindexing it two days ago. —Cryptic 00:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Context is DRV. Guy (Help!) 10:03, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, yes; it's how I found the page to noindex. All I'm saying is that it's a different user abusing the poor dead horse over there; there was no need to cast aspersions on Travisharger, as you did above and in the deletion log. —Cryptic 17:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and refer to Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2015_July_1. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, probably moot given User:JzG's speedy deletion, but I think the community consensus is quite clear that an article is not wanted on this topic at this time. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.