Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TimChildHopeUk/ChildHope UK
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Promotional, unsourced WP:FAKEARTICLE in the userspace of an indefinitely blocked user. MER-C 01:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. Hasn't been edited since September 2010. --E♴(talk) 13:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete-- Per nom, WP:STALEDRAFT, WP:UP#COPIES and WP:NOTWEBHOST.--Hu12 (talk) 15:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per above, WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:16, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Block was for name, not for any acts by the user. Organization is real (named in WP article), and removal does not benefit WP. Yes it is stale - but the bitten author was apparently trying to be a genuine editor. Collect (talk) 12:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."
Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.