Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Theturquoisesummer/Oramics (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux Talk 03:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theturquoisesummer/Oramics (band)[edit]

User:Theturquoisesummer/Oramics (band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Blank user space draft by blocked user. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as is, blanked. The page was responsibly blanked by the user, then a user in good standing, for good reason, and the user chose to not use {{db-u1}}. In userspace, blanking does not imply a request to delete, but is indeed the recommended action for something to go on the backburner for a long time. Blocked users may return and be unblocked, and may access their userspace and contributions. Blocked users do not have their userspace deleted just because they were blocked. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Mendaliv below, previously deleted. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Non-viable article about a subject previously deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auramics. Even if we discount that, this specific draft was userfied (rather than getting A7ed) following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oramics (band). The userfication was intended as a courtesy to the user and subject under the presumption that the band might become notable within the next year. That doesn't look to have happened. While the blanking doesn't imply a U1 request, I think it's pretty evident from the blanking and context that the editor didn't want it anymore. The editor isn't coming back either... checkuser blocks that come down as a result of AfD disruption aren't often reversed. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 08:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.