Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Theawakenedone/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . This isn't gibberish, this is a resume. It's badly written, but definitely self-promotion. Probably could have died as a G11. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theawakenedone/sandbox[edit]

This AfC submission reads like total nonsense. Not jibberish for a CSD but incomprehensable to me. Legacypac (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, also looks like vandalism. (Comment by ⚞Lj⚟ (t·c)) on 04:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced incoherent nonsense. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep according to a disambiguation redlink (!), rewilding is a neologism for camping. It is indeed a mess and I don't hold much hope for its survival as an article, but I do not see anything that necessitated this draft's deletion nom less than 3 hours after it was created. See also WP:BITE. VQuakr (talk) 01:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.