Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sukuk51

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. Nakon 03:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sukuk51[edit]

User:Sukuk51 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
21:53, 9 July 2015 RHaworth (talk · contribs) moved page User:Sukuk51 to User:Sukuk51/sandbox without leaving a redirect.

Userpage is masquerading as an article Brianhe (talk) 23:31, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • There may be some other issues with the editor, but it is short, it covers what is of interest to the editor and what they are working on. It isn't "an article" any more than my "my philosophy" section on my user page is. Simply put, I think deleting this short piece of self-identification would be overkill and not in line with consensus policy. Dennis Brown - 23:36, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, when I opened the MfD the userpage looked like this. Brianhe (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • This conversation might be more fit for ANI. The user initially redirected his userpage and talk page to Islamophobia; Jytdog and I removed the redirects because they're disruptive, a user's main page and talk shouldn't redirect to an irrelevant page (though I haven't seen this mentioned in our policies, but maybe it should be mentioned). So now the editor just copied parts of the Islamophobia article to his userpage and talk page. I don't know what to say about that. I think an admin should just give him a proper warning, say that he doesn't own his talk page and people should be able to leave him messages when necessary, and those messages shouldn't be obstructed by something that looks like an article draft. But there's a chance that if we leave this guy alone then he might just go away. He was here to advertise his websites and that didn't go well, he might not have anything left to do here. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 07:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that the userpage was not tagged, and the user was not notified. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:23, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just notified him. [1] --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually yes [2] Brianhe (talk) 03:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I see now, User:Sukuk51 removed the mfd notice and the notifications. Appropriately, User:Sukuk51 has already been blocked for disruptive editing. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not required.Silver Samurai 07:44, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sock blocked indef. Nakon 03:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.