Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sam Korn/Catholic Church of Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep. This survived a MfD just over a week ago. Let's not turn this into another GNAA. The community has already made a decision about this. Acetic Acid 05:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sam Korn/Catholic Church of Wikipedia

Delete This article is highly offensive to Roman Catholics, and doesn't add anything to Wikipedia Shanedidona 23:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I pushed hard for this to be moved out of namespace, and I'm still mortified by the unintended result of Essjay's leaving. This is now in user-space. We don't censor good-faith userspace without a very compelling reason (threats of violence, for example.) This doesn't rise to that level. Xoloz 23:58, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:Offensive and blantly unencyclopedic. Chooserr
- It's not an encyclopedia article!--Sean|Bla ck 01:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Again: It's not an article. It's in Sam Korn's userspace where it doesn't do any harm. if you find it offensive, ignore it.--Sean|Bla ck 01:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - this has only just been through mfd, and was kept by consensus on November 30th. See here -- Francs 2000 01:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. It's in Sam's userspace, let it be. We don't need this all over again. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 02:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, harmless. Christopher Parham (talk) 02:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. The last MfD just closed on 30 November. Are you not satisfied with the loss of one invaluable user? --Tantalum T e lluride 02:24, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: When discussions such as this are being re-listed, will someone please post a link to the prior discussion? Preferably right at the top with the nomination. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 04:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is a USER PAGE!!!! Sethie 04:54, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - already been through mfd, and the consensus was keep. Besides, it's in the user space. LordViD 05:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.