Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sakkuya~enwiki/Sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sakkuya~enwiki/Sandbox[edit]

Stale userspace draft by an inactive user. A search indicates the topic isn't notable in the slightest. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 16:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and great to see you tackling stale userspace. Since it is a sandbox and sandboxes are never really fully gone you can just blank them. Legacypac (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Speediable G11. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The nomination rationale is completely invalid as a reason for deletion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - but because it's unambiguously promotion, not for any reason in the nomination. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination reasoning is fine. We don't indefinately host non-notable topics in userspace Legacypac (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to respond to you as though you're unfamiliar with WP:STALE. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:08, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promo. –Davey2010^Talk 22:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.