Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rooofer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete (G11). I agree with Carlossuarez46, the first paragraph is not much better than the last. Ruslik (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Rooofer

blatant advertising Ashleyvh (talk) 08:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

• delete was previously deleted at G11 speedy. Agathoclea (talk) 10:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment then why hasn't it been re-speedied? //roux   18:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
    • What's the hurry? I'd rather have a full discussion in a situation like this, as it is not an article. Also the comment below shows an alternative which solves the advertising problem without deletion. Agathoclea (talk) 23:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
    • There is no evidence that User:Rooofer is Ethan Andrews Jennings, III, considering the user's talk page actively promotes homophobia (a hate crime in the UK) a cautious interpretation of WP:REALNAME might be sensible and a reason for blocking this user account quickly, as it could have been set up as an attack on this "real" person or the company identified.—Ashleyvh (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
• Keep minus last paragraph Assuming any wisdom on his part, he will leave the commercial part off. Collect (talk) 12:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
• Delete the first paragraph is too much information for a user box; using your state contractor's license is basically saying look me up and hire me, too. Little different than putting your bar association #, bailbonds license #, or livery license number on a page - does nothing to help build an encyclopedia and if not G11 enough for you, certainly WP:MYSPACEish. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Blatant advertisement for self. LetsdrinkTea 02:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.