Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ridiceo/sandbox/User Conduct

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted . (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ridiceo/sandbox/User Conduct[edit]

User:Ridiceo/sandbox/User Conduct (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is unnecessary WP:POLEMIC, as the author is not involved in any conduct dispute resolution process. wumbolo ^^^ 16:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose deletion, as WP:POLEMIC states

    Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws. The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided it will be used in a timely manner.

I've compiled this information in preparation for a future conduct dispute process. It is not an attack on another user, It is a collection of diffs regarding conduct by that user, and notes to why I included those diffs. The page will be deleted by myself if I decide not to go forward with a conduct dispute resolution process. WP:POLEMIC specifically allows for the compilation of diffs in preparation for a dispute resolution process. Ridiceo (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Creator of page stated 'It depends.' and 'I'm simply using that page to store information for possible use later.' here. I don't think storing diffs for a rainy day counts as valid. PeterTheFourth (talk) 20:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've already explained that I am preparing this information for a future dispute resolution. What you "think" counts as valid doesn't constitute what is and isn't allowed on userpages. Your subjective interpretation doesn't change the rules. Ridiceo (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this is pretty much an attack page. If you want to store this, do it off site preferably offline. Legacypac (talk) 21:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.