Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Professor JR/sandbox/draft article

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep as it is now in use for other purposes, but rev-delete problematic early revsions. JohnCD (talk) 14:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Professor JR/sandbox/draft article[edit]

User:Professor JR/sandbox/draft article (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The single-purpose account in question created this following a snow closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alleged Clinton Controversies. The article was deleted because the entire premise itself...that there is an overarching "Clinton conspiracy" is so blindly BLP-violating (along with issues of coatracks and not scandals, among others. There is no valid reason to retain an unsalvageable, BLP-violating morass in user-space. I blanked the page a week ago, but the SPA has reverted that. It seems I now need to go get a life. I wonder if Wal-Mart is having a sale today. Tarc (talk) 12:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Procedurally close. User has blanked the page. As long as the content isn't reinstated, I think the purpose of the MfD is satisfied. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. As a copy, a fork, of others' materials, the content in the history is not properly attributed. If unblanked, it is a serious WP:Copyrights compliance hazard. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I'd actually forgotten about this; I initially just blanked this page myself but on reflection, the content is so god-awful poor that it needs to be purged from history entirely. Tarc (talk) 12:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rev-del everything before this diff. Keep the page, as the user in question is now using it for other purposes. Brustopher (talk) 23:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.