Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pontifact/Ron McVan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Blanked is good. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pontifact/Ron McVan[edit]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 02:54, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned draft, editor hasn't edited at all since February 2014. Doug Weller talk 12:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't think it is a viable draft, just blank it. If there is no future interest in the drafted subject, then your decision to blank is effectively final, and proven correct. If incorrect, and future editor can review the history and act. Either way, there is no advantage, but some cost, in coming here to ask the community to make a fairly fast, fairly permanent decision based on very limited information. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 02:54, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as blanked by the nominator. There are far too many abandoned drafts for feeding them through MfD to be viable, let alone a good use of MfD. Borderline cases are not easy work, and non-borderline cases don't require formal decision making processes. The inactive Pontifact (talk · contribs) was a productive editor, editors have broad leeway in their own usersapce, and userpages are not deleted due to inactivity of the user. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.